Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but thicker and heavier than LG V50 ThinQ. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger number of cores (and also faster). The LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ has more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in low light situations and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher resolution camera and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.