Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy F62 body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it's heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 79 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a back camera with much more megapixels, better 30 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.