Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's global score of 77.9. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy F62 is somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's somewhat thinner and way newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better display density. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity.
The Galaxy F62 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video, higher 30 fps video frame rate and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.