Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting a global score of 88.1 against 79.7. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than Motorola Moto G Stylus.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus, because although it has less CPU cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy F62 features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.