Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Moto Z4's score of 79.8. Samsung Galaxy F62's body is newer, but noticeably thicker and notably heavier than Moto Z4. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z4, because although it has lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy F62 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.