Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy F62's 88.1 global score. Both phones in this review include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Galaxy F62, even though both were released with only a couple months difference.
The Galaxy F62 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both have a greater pixels amount per inch in the display, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a screen with the same size. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 4 more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62. They have a 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size back camera sensor and the same 30 fps video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.