Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy F62's 88.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy F62, although it was released a little bit further than a year before. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, while Galaxy F62 has Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. They have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the same pixels density and a display with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.