Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a global score of 88.1 against 81. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is notably newer, but heavier and way thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit larger screen. Galaxy F62 features much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a much higher video resolution and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.