Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M31, with an 88.1 score against 86.5. Even though Galaxy F62 is newer than the Samsung Galaxy M31, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy M31 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Galaxy M31 also has more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy M31 and Galaxy F62 have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy M31 has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, and they both have the same screen brightness, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 has better battery life than Galaxy M31, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 6000mAh. Samsung Galaxy M31 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F62. Both of them have a 0.59 inches sensor, the same video definition, a same resolution camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.