Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31s's overall score of 88. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy M31s, but it is just a little heavier. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Galaxy M31s has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy M31s also has 4 more cores (although slower). The Galaxy F62 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a little bigger display.
The Galaxy M31s shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy F62. Both of them have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy M31s, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.