Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, with a global score of 88.1 against 87.1. Galaxy F62's construction is noticeably newer, but just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note9. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note9 also has a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.