Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 overall score. Galaxy F62's construction is a lot newer, but incredibly heavier and a lot thicker than Galaxy S6 edge+. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, giving you a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy F62 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a much larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.