Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Sony Xperia XZ1's 78.3 score. The Galaxy F62 body is notably newer, but heavier and thicker than the Sony Xperia XZ1. Xperia XZ1 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZ1, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy F62 captures much better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs, a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy F62 has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 159% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.