Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 operating system. Despite being the best device in this review, we must highlight that it is also a somewhat heavier and thicker device.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy F62 captures clearer photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.