Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, with a general score of 88.1 against 76.4. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy F62's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 5s.
The Galaxy F62 features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F62 also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 5s features just a bit better screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with more screen brightness and a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a lot bigger sensor, a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.