Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a noticeably newer phone than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it is just a little thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a bit brighter screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy F62 takes much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.