Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 4.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Flip 7 (Rumored), with a 77.7 score against 72.1. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy Flip 7 (Rumored) has Android 15. The HTC One M9 has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Flip 7 (Rumored), because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics processor.
The HTC One M9 has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy Flip 7 (Rumored), although it has a lot smaller screen. Galaxy Flip 7 (Rumored) and HTC One M9 feature incredibly similar cameras, although the HTC One M9 has a way less MP camera in the back, a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a much worse image and video quality and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video.
The Galaxy Flip 7 (Rumored) has a way bigger storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Flip 7 (Rumored) counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.