Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than iPhone XS Max's score of 84.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is newer and just a little bit thinner than the iPhone XS Max's, although it is also way heavier. IPhone XS Max has a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count in each display inch and a little higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy Fold features a slightly better camera than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size back camera sensor and a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger aperture. The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than the Apple iPhone XS Max, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.