Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than Google Nexus 6P, having a overall score of 97.6 against 80.3. Even though the Galaxy Fold is a lot heavier than the Google Nexus 6P, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. The Google Nexus 6P features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Fold takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 27 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.