Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Google Pixel 2, with a 97.6 score against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer and somewhat thinner device than the Google Pixel 2, although it is also notably heavier. Google Pixel 2 features a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller screen and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
Galaxy Fold features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a less megapixels camera in the back and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.