Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Google Pixel XL, with a global score of 97.6 against 81.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's thinner and a lot newer. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
Google Pixel XL has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Fold captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality photos, a less MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
Galaxy Fold counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel XL, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.