Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the LG V20, having a 97.6 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the LG V20. The LG V20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel amount in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and 8 GB more RAM. Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V20, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than LG V20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG V20, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.