Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4, so it counts with some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is newer and notably thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is also noticeably heavier.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 12% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.