Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having a 97.6 score against 77.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's way thinner and a lot newer. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a quite better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a way larger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Fold features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.