Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 score. Even though Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than the Motorola Edge 50, it's body is still thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.