Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11. The Galaxy Fold body is thinner but heavier than Moto G Stylus, and both of them were released only a couple months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Fold and Motorola Moto G Stylus have incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2300px, it also counts with a bit better display density.
Moto G Stylus shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features much more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Stylus, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.