Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue and Gloss Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's overall score of 79.9. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, so it provides the user some nice extra features. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and extremely heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is still thinner.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution. Galaxy Fold counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a processor that's very similar to the CPU in Galaxy Fold, both have 8 cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3 percent greater battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.