Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having a global score of 97.6 against 81. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a much heavier phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but they are 0.27inches thick.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution and a larger display. Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold has a little better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much bigger aperture.
Galaxy Fold features a little better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.