Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Galaxy M30s, having a 97.6 score against 83.3. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is much thinner but heavier than Galaxy M30s, and both of them were released only 0 months apart. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy M30s has Android 11.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Fold has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy M30s shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.