Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s overall score of 79.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body has the same thickness than Galaxy S6 edge+, but it is way heavier.
The Galaxy Fold has a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster). The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels amount per screen inch.
Galaxy Fold captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower video definition and a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.