Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and White |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Although it's the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Fold is a incredibly older, a lot thicker and much heavier cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a bit larger screen and a just a little better screen pixels density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy Fold, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor, a back facing camera with much more MP and a much higher video quality.
The Galaxy Fold costs a bit more than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.