Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. Despite of the fact Galaxy Fold is older and incredibly heavier than the vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still just a little thinner. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The vivo X60 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy Fold. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 12 GB RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Fold counts with a little longer battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.