Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's score of 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is newer and notably thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, although it is heavier. Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246, it also counts with a bit higher display pixels density. The Galaxy Fold has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 feature very similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot tinier diafragm aperture, they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.