Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than the Galaxy J5 (2017)'s score of 71.8. The LG V50 ThinQ body is newer than the Galaxy J5 (2017)'s, but it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ features a better hardware performance than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ has a lot better screen than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a larger screen, a lot higher display pixels density and a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG V50 ThinQ features greater battery life than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.