Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J6, getting a global score of 80.3 against 73.7. The Google Nexus 6P is a much older and somewhat heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy J6, but Google made it a little thinner anyway. The Google Nexus 6P has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a little larger screen, a much greater display pixel density and a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better performance than Galaxy J6. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The Google Nexus 6P features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Google Nexus 6P shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a back camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy J6, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.