Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is much better than Galaxy J6's 73.7 general score. The Google Pixel 2 is a a little bit thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy J6, although both of them were released only 7 months apart. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy J6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px. The Google Pixel 2 takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J6, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Google Pixel 2 has a greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy J6 features a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.