Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J6's global score of 73.7. LG V50 ThinQ's body is newer than Samsung Galaxy J6's, but it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy J6, because it has a lot higher display pixel density, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a little bit bigger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J6, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a quite better performance than Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy J6, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features a much better camera than Galaxy J6, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a lot better video resolution and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.