Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 global score. The LG V50 ThinQ design is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s, but it's just a little bit heavier and a little thicker. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a larger screen and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a lesser MP back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.