Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 overall score. Motorola Edge 50's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), but it is a bit lighter. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Edge 50 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a better resolution of 1220 x 2712, a larger display and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 39 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.