Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is notably newer and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s, but it is also somewhat heavier.
Galaxy J7 (2017) has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a quite higher pixels count in each inch of display, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 496 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 58% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.