Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 (2017), having a overall score of 78.8 against 73.5. These phones include Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The vivo X60 Pro body is extremely newer, just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Galaxy J7 (2017).
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a quite lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 17 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.