Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-07-13 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), having a score of 77 against 72.5. The LG V20 design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), although it was released just 22 months before. LG V20 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
LG V20 has a much better display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher screen density. LG V20 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V20 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy J7 (2018) features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The LG V20 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.