Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, getting a score of 77.8 against 76.1. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, it's way thinner and notably newer. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a just a little better display pixel density, a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a way larger screen. The Galaxy J7 Max counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way higher video resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 73 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.