Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2's global score of 75.3. Google Pixel 2's design has the same thickness than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, but it's somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 2 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Google Pixel 2 has a greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 2 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos, a much higher video definition and a larger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.