Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a overall score of 77.8 against 75.3. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is noticeably thinner but extremely heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2. These devices include Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a much larger screen and a just a little better amount of pixels per screen inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 features a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a way better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 73 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.