Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, getting a 78.8 score against 75.3. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The vivo X60 Pro is a just a little bit thinner but just a little heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
The vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.