Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's global score of 72.7. IPhone 8's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Galaxy J7 Refine, even though it was released only 9 months before. The iPhone 8 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density and a slightly higher 750 x 1334 resolution.
IPhone 8 counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 8 also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone 8 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a larger sensor and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has an 81% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.