Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has a global score of 76.4, which is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's score of 72.7. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola Droid Turbo is a older and noticeably thicker cellphone than the Galaxy J7 Refine, but Motorola managed to make it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Motorola Droid Turbo features an incredibly better display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and much more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has lesser cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy J7 Refine has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy J7 Refine also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Motorola Droid Turbo shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.