Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's general score of 72.7. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola DROID Turbo is a notably older and way thicker device than Galaxy J7 Refine, but Motorola could make it a little bit lighter anyway.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better looking display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a much greater display pixel density. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and 1 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way more megapixels back camera. Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.