Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, having a global score of 81.2 against 72.7. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has the older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50's construction is newer, a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much higher 1220 x 2712px resolution, a larger display and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy J7 Refine counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot better video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.